Visual Inspections of Emergency Lights & Exit Signs

While computerised emergency light and exit sign monitoring systems exist and provide value to building owners and managers, they have limitations that only a survey by an experienced and competent professional can identify. Examples include;

• Defects, Non-Conformances and Physical Damage
  Visual inspections help identify conditions such as broken or damaged components such as diffusers, improper installations, faded signs, or wear and tear that could adversely affect the operation of emergency lighting or exit sign systems
• Verification of adequate visibility and identification of exits and paths of travel to exits.
  The Objective E4O1, Functional Statement E4F1 and Performance Requirements E4P1 of the National Construction Code (NCC) establish the criteria for the operation and performance of emergency lights and exit signs to ensure the adequate visibility upon failure of normal artificial lighting and the means to identify exits and paths of travel to an exit during an emergency.  A visual inspection is necessary to assess these requirements throughout all areas of a building including in the path of travel to required exits and exits.
• Obstructions, barriers and changes to building layout or design
  Building modifications, both approved and unapproved, can compromise the effectiveness of directional exit signs. Visual inspections help identify obstructions, barriers, or changes in building layout that computerised monitoring systems cannot detect.

Surveys conducted by Firewize technicians over many years have identified many common defects and non-conformances that place the occupants of buildings at risk from fire or other emergency;

• Exit sign diffusers missing or damaged;
• Emergency lights and exit signs not connected to the computer-monitored system;
• Exit signs indicating the wrong direction;
• Emergency lights with the globe missing;
• Exit signs that are non-compliant and have faded.

These findings highlighted limitations in the automated system’s ability to detect visually apparent issues. Despite its sophistication, the system could not flag elements like damaged components or regulatory deviations that require human observation.

While automated emergency light and exit sign test and monitoring systems are invaluable for reporting, they must be complemented by regular (six-monthly) visual inspections to ensure comprehensive compliance. A balanced approach that reflects the intent and requirements of AS 2293.2, combine the strengths of monitoring technology with the insights provided by human inspectors, is essential to maintaining the safety and functionality of emergency lighting and exit sign systems.

By adhering to the standards set out in AS 2293.2:2019 and incorporating routine visual inspections into maintenance schedules, building managers can significantly enhance compliance and safety outcomes.